STACKMODERNE
AI evaluation and observability / GUIDE

LLM evaluation: measure the capability actually required

Evaluate an LLM with behavior contracts, protected sets, OOD robustness, schema accuracy and baseline comparison.

ENGINEERING THESIS

Useful evaluation starts with the required capability and forbidden failures, not a generic benchmark.

COMMON FAILURE

A high average score can coexist with rare but unacceptable failures on the real mission.

DECISION

The verdict must be bounded to the model, prompt, runtime, data and protocol that were actually measured.

01 / REALIZATION

What the architecture must make explicit

Evaluating an AI system binds a capability, an exact object, a protocol, observations and a decision rule. An isolated score is not a qualification.

01
Contemporary baseline
02
Research and protected sets
03
Failure-locus measurements
04
Output receipts and identity
02 / METHOD

Move from a keyword to an inspectable engineering decision

01

Contract

Define required behavior, forbidden failures and thresholds before testing.

02

Separate

Keep search, confirmation, protected data and Fresh Final apart to prevent contamination.

03

Measure

Record outputs, metrics, failures, latency and measured-subject identity.

04

Adjudicate

Interpret observations without letting the candidate producer impose the verdict.

03 / EVIDENCE GATES

A claim is only as strong as its binding

The gate must evaluate the exact output produced by the exact realization. Integrity, scientific validity and authority are related, but never interchangeable.

G1
Quality and fidelity
G2
ROB and OOD
G3
Schema and refusal
G4
Latency, memory and cost
FAQ

Questions that change the design

What does llm evaluation: measure the capability actually required require?

Useful evaluation starts with the required capability and forbidden failures, not a generic benchmark. Evaluating an AI system binds a capability, an exact object, a protocol, observations and a decision rule. An isolated score is not a qualification.

Which evidence should be retained?

At minimum: exact realization identity, inputs and outputs, protocol version, measurements, failure cases and the decision rule. The verdict must be bounded to the model, prompt, runtime, data and protocol that were actually measured.

Does AMF prescribe a particular model?

No. AMF treats the model, runtime, data, tools and deterministic components as candidate materials. Their retention depends on measured contribution and declared constraints.