STACKMODERNE
AI systems architecture / GUIDE

Composable AI systems: interfaces, state and evidence

Design composable AI systems with interface contracts, explicit state, routing, failure isolation and composition evidence.

ENGINEERING THESIS

Useful composability requires input-output schemas, unambiguous responsibilities and a policy for every partial failure.

COMMON FAILURE

Assembling APIs and agents without contracts turns local errors into unpredictable system behavior.

DECISION

A component enters the realization only when its role, authority and effects on other components are measured.

01 / REALIZATION

What the architecture must make explicit

The engineering object is the complete realization. A model is only one possible component among data, memory, routing, tools, rules, verifiers and runtime.

01
Capability contract and interfaces
02
Responsibility allocation
03
State, routing and failure paths
04
Complete realization identity
02 / METHOD

Move from a keyword to an inspectable engineering decision

01

Observe

Measure the baseline and bind every behavior to the exact realization that produced it.

02

Intervene

Test one change at a time to attribute gains and regressions.

03

Compose

Verify interfaces, shared state and interactions before promotion.

04

Qualify

Apply hard gates to the frozen realization within a declared scope.

03 / EVIDENCE GATES

A claim is only as strong as its binding

The gate must evaluate the exact output produced by the exact realization. Integrity, scientific validity and authority are related, but never interchangeable.

G1
Functional capability
G2
Composition interactions
G3
Latency and total cost
G4
Operational authority
FAQ

Questions that change the design

What does composable ai systems: interfaces, state and evidence require?

Useful composability requires input-output schemas, unambiguous responsibilities and a policy for every partial failure. The engineering object is the complete realization. A model is only one possible component among data, memory, routing, tools, rules, verifiers and runtime.

Which evidence should be retained?

At minimum: exact realization identity, inputs and outputs, protocol version, measurements, failure cases and the decision rule. A component enters the realization only when its role, authority and effects on other components are measured.

Does AMF prescribe a particular model?

No. AMF treats the model, runtime, data, tools and deterministic components as candidate materials. Their retention depends on measured contribution and declared constraints.